Day Of The Dead (2008)

DVD Cover (First Look Home Entertainment #1)
Add to Collection
Sign up to add this to your collection
Add to Favorites
Sign up to add this to your favorites
Movie Stills - View all?
Stills Stills Stills Stills
User Lists:
> Worst Films of 2008
Overall Rating 38%
Overall Rating
Ranked #2,608
...out of 10,228 movies
Check In? Sign up to check in!
Genres / Traits: Horror Zombie Film 3-D

In Leadville, Colorado, Captain Rhodes and his army seals off the town to contain an influenza-type epidemic. The locals are not allowed to leave the town and the Pine Valley Medical Center is crowded with sick people. Corporal Sarah Bowman was born and raised in Leadville and goes to her home with Private Bud Crain to visit her mother. Sarah finds that her mother is ill and takes her to the local hospital. However, the sick people suddenly transform in flesh eating, fast moving zombies which attack the non-infected humans. Sarah, Bud and Private Salazar get a jeep and head to the town exit to escape from the dead. But Sarah hears the voice of her brother, Trevor, on the radio and is compelled to go to the radio station where Trevor is hidden with his girlfriend Nina. The group of survivors drives to the isolated Nike missile site seeking shelter, where they discover an underground army base. --IMDb
Mena Suvari
Mena Suvari
Nick Cannon
Nick Cannon
Michael Welch
Michael Welch
AnnaLynne McCord
AnnaLynne McCord
Stark Sands
Stark Sands
Review by Tristan
Added: April 13, 2008
In my opinion, Day of the Dead is the best zombie film ever made. There isn't even room for argument. It's not my favourite zombie movie, as Zombi 2 will always hold that place in my heart, but Day of the Dead is a far greater cinematic accomplishment, even for the master of the genre, Mr. Romero. So when I read that there was going to be a remake, or re-imagining, you can imagine that I was filled with complete disgust. Finding out that Steve Miner - best known for Friday the 13th II and III - was set to direct did help a little. Then a few months later the cast list and a few details about the film were released, and I lost all hope.

In a small "charming shit hole of a town", a flu-like outbreak causes much concern with the US government. They quarantine the town, cutting off its roads and phone lines in an attempt to squash the spread of the virus. Sarah Bowman (Mena Suvari) an officer in the US army is stationed in her hometown where with the help of Private Salazar (Nick Cannon), Private Cain (Stark Sands) and her brother Trevor (Michael Welch) she hordes everyone to the local hospital to try and get them some medical attention. After her superior officer (Ving Rhames) tells her this is not just an exercise and that "the shit is real", she is forced to step up and take control of the situation. This is easier said than done, as the infected townsfolk start dropping like flies and coming back to life as flesh eating zombies that terrorize the town.

I knew from the moment I heard about the remake that I would have difficulty enjoying it. It's been mocked and trashed on every horror site, and after finally sitting down to watch it, I completely understand why. If I love zombie movies and didn't even want to give this a chance, that's a pretty clear sign that something has gone horribly wrong. Taking his cues from Zack Snyder's 2004 remake of Dawn of the Dead, Miner went with the "fast zombies" for this one. This is compared to the original Dead films, in which the zombies moved at a snail's pace, and were basically just a nuisance until they gathered into large packs. Even though I prefer the traditional zombie, I'll admit that the speed does give them a terrifying new edge and makes things a lot more difficult for our little band of survivors. Unfortunately, Miner couldn't have just made them faster and called it a day. Mr. Ambitious had to go over the top with it. These "ninja" zombies can run faster than humans, crawl along the ceiling, jump over vehicles, and scale buildings. I give him credit for trying something new, but these are zombies.

As far as the "acting" goes, this movie could not have been worse. Ving Rhames, the only man who could have shined any ray of hope on this picture, had a brief cameo and was gone within the first third of the movie. So we're left with Mena Suvari who peaked with her role in American Beauty all of 10 years ago, Michael Welch, a kid my age who has about as much acting talent as I do, and Nick Cannon the hip, street-walking, jive-talking army boy. In a nutshell, it's 3 talentless actors portraying boring, cliched characters for the entire course of the movie.

In a movie like this, I can get tolerate some poor acting if there's an interesting storyline, or some interesting twist that will hold my attention even though I really don't want to be watching it in the first place. And like most other films before it, the poor acting is coupled with a poor script. It has some of the worst lines, bad decisions and lamest coincidences any writer could have come up with. If you're not big on spoilers, I suggest skipping the next few lines, but they're quite mild in the grand scheme of things. First of all, you're in a town infested with zombies, and someone runs by your window. Why would you ask "what was that?" You know what it is, it's a zombie. It's not a cat or a wind chime, it's a zombie. This happens more than once. Also, just because you see the silhouette of someone in a window, why do you think that it's the safest place to barricade yourself into. Zombies cast shadows too, believe it or not. One of my personal favourites is the people who open their doors to let people in, and then ask them if they're "one of them" while brandishing a weapon. Probably should have checked that before you let them in. And don't you just love when you're in the middle of the woods, in some abandoned house and you stumble upon all the answers to the outbreak of the virus? Very believable indeed. Oh, and did I mention one of the zombies was a vegetarian, and had the hots for one of the living characters? Only in this movie.

I know what you're thinking. Bad script, bad acting - the gore and special effects have to be the saving grace. Strike three. What little gore there was was everybody's favourite - CGI. It looked more like play dough being squeezed through a tube than actual blood. In all honesty, I've seen more realistic blood in video games. Most of the zombie effects and makeup were done with CGI as well, and the ones that weren't looked awful. Almost all of them looked identical, and if I were to compare them to anything, it would be Deadite Ash in Evil Dead II. The milky eyes, the enlarged brow and cheeks to give the eyes a sunken look, it was just terrible.

So there you have it, one of the lamest movies I've ever seen, and probably the leader for worst zombie movie ever. Perhaps if it didn't bear the title Day of the Dead it would have had a better shot with audiences, but when you try your hand on a classic and fail, it tends to be even worse for you. It's a shame that after all the hits Steve Miner's had in the past, he had to return to the movie biz with this massive failure. I should be killed for saying it, but I think I might have enjoyed Day Of The Dead 2: Contagium just the same, if not more. This film receives my second 0/10, and I would not recommend this to a single person, zombie fanatic or not. This one didn't even work as a zombie-comedy, which is what I'm guessing the attempt was. It wasn't funny, it wasn't believable, and it was most certainly not enjoyable.

Chad #1: Chad - added 04/29/2008, 11:19 PM
My god... why did I even bother renting this? 0/10.
Edd #2: Edd - added 08/13/2008, 09:09 AM
How could I have went wrong with Mena Suvari and Nick Cannon? 0/10
Hisdinnerisintheoven #3: Hisdinnerisintheoven - added 05/31/2010, 08:10 PM
If you could digitize shit and watch it... it would look much like this.
Crispy #4: Crispy - added 04/11/2012, 03:06 AM
I'll be the first one to say I didn't hate it. I just didn't like it, and I will be mirroring everyone else in their avoid recommendation.
Bill Wolford #5: Bill Wolford - added 04/11/2012, 03:34 AM
I've found that trying what everyone else likes & hating what everyone else hates is a disaster. I just try to do as much research on the film I might be interested in as possible. Case in point; I knew some people who were singing the praises of giallo films, so I grabbed about 30-40 of them & dug in. About 25 of those are now in the garbage or traded in for stuff I know I'll like. This film was all right for me personally. I shut of my brain completely & didn't even think about the original Day of The Dead, and I wasted 90 minutes pretty good. I might even re-watch it sometime. I'd give it around a 2-4 out of 10, because I've realized that I have to be kind of forgiving when I can't enjoy every type of thriller/horror/giallo/etc. that comes down the line, if I can shut off my brain & reasoning powers for 90 mins I can like a lower level zombie film like this (Day of the Dead 2: Contagion falls under this as well).
Sign up to add your comment. Sign up to add your comment.
Recommended Movies
Night Of The Living Dead 3D Dawn Of The Dead Diary Of The Dead Survival Of The Dead Day Of The Dead: Bloodline Dawn Of The Dead Night Of The Living Dead Day Of The Dead Land Of The Dead Night Of The Living Dead 3D: Re-Animation Day Of The Dead 2: Contagium Night Of The Living Dead: Darkest Dawn Night Of The Living Dead Night Of The Animated Dead Zombies! Zombies! Zombies! Another Night Of The Living Dead Wicked Little Things Day Of The Dead
Layout, reviews and code © 2000-2022 | Privacy Policy
Contact: Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Review Updates